fydis.
Scope the assessment

From brief to evidence.

A brief goes in; an audit-ready file comes out. Between the two sits a deterministic chain, and every stage of it states the condition that fails it. Below, the method is not explained; it is performed, on a figure that reconciles to the dollar.

The method, published

One pipeline, brief to evidence.

  1. 01Brief

    A question that stays unverified until it is proven.

    Every workflow starts with a brief in plain language, the way you would brief a junior, with the client file attached. Fydis holds it as the starting state: unverified, and unable to be signed, cited, or exported until the steps below are complete.

  2. 02Retrieve

    Source rows read where they sit.

    Fydis reads the systems the practice already runs and pulls source rows, not summaries of them. Citations point to the exact cell, row or paragraph, and one click opens the source at that location.

    Fails whena material source system cannot be read as rows. Pasted exports and screenshots do not qualify as retrieval.

  3. 03Verify

    Every claim resolves to a source, and every figure reconciles.

    Each material claim is bound to a primary record such as the fee ledger, the platform register or the policy file. The source register must sum to the stated figure to the dollar. A claim with no record behind it is flagged.

    Fails whenany material claim cannot be resolved to a primary record, or when source rows do not reconcile to the stated figure, with the variance shown.

  4. 04Evidence

    The file leaves with everything needed to defend it.

    Sign-off is captured from named approvers and written to tamper-evident storage with 7-year retention. The file exports with its source register, sign-off history, clause map and replay hash as one audit pack; re-running the chain on the same inputs reproduces the hash byte-identically.

    Fails whenno authorised signer has approved, when the approval predates the evidence it covers, or when a re-run produces a different hash.

fydis.Verified output · Remediation review
Brief

Q3 remediation provision, fee-for-no-service review across the adviser book?

Reconciled across 4 of 9 systemssource rows, not summaries
  • XplanFee ledger · advice fees charged 2014-20211,194,240
  • HUB24Platform fee rebates · affected accounts612,830
  • NetwealthAdviser service fees · no documented service385,460
  • BT PanoramaLegacy book trail fees · pre-transition258,862
Reconciled totalAUD2,451,392

Signed by the Responsible Manager· sign-off logged

Replay hash sha256:4c9e1aa802f6

7 years tamper-evident · byte-identical on re-run

No signup · Sandboxed data

See it run on a real analysis.

The trace renders against a real consumer-remediation calculation (mapped to ASIC RG 277). Click any node to inspect the source rows, the method, and the approval log.

Open the live trace The output, as a document